Sunday, October 23, 2011

Close Reading #3 - "Letting Go" by David Sedaris

Read it here!

David Sedaris's article "Letting Go" is all about giving up smoking, or, as a German woman he once met put it, "finishing" with smoking. Sedaris is all about the comedy so his anti-smoking message was pretty subtle but his use of certain techniques definitely created one.
His diction and detail created conflicting views of smoking, while he uses syntax everywhere for comedic affect. An example of his use of syntax is when he places the funniest part, or the punch line, at the end of the sentence. For example, he writes "... I went to the world's first elementary school, one where we wrote on cave walls and hunted our lunch with cubs." His use of diction and details demonstrate his feelings on smoking, some positive and some negative. He starts out by using words that contribute to good idea of cigarettes, calling them "wonderful" and a "godsend". He also talks about the bonding that takes place between fellow smokers. Cigarettes, he says, act as a "beacon" that "somehow bring [them] together", calling other smokers "[his] team". Other diction used later and vivid details show the flip side of smoking, the side that ultimately won the argument in Sedaris's mind.  He describes the effects of smoking, first on his uncle and later, his mother. His Uncle Dick had a "mucky" cough that was "painful sounding" and ultimately led to his death due to lung cancer. Later, his mother developed the same cough. He said that she would have to stop "every fifth step or so, while she wheezed and sputtered and pounded her chest with her fist" because the smoking had so damaged her lungs. She also died to lung cancer. By ending with these details and diction choices, Sedaris gives them the most weight, much the same way he puts the funniest part of the sentence at the end for maximum impact. He ends the essay with the day he quit smoking, following up the negative sides of smoking, subtly sending his audience an anti-smoking message.

3 comments:

  1. Good work, you make very good points, however i think that with this one you could maybe back them up a little bit better? And it would probably help to separate it into paragraphs but other than that great work and very insightful points.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice job Emily! You really found good examples and support for your thesis. However, I think your thesis could be a little stronger and more detailed, and it would make your essay even better. Also, I would suggest to make separate paragraphs for your examples of diction, detail, and syntax to make it easier for the reader to follow. overall great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good analysis, you found some nice quotes to bring in to support the meaning you pick out from his piece. (Good choice of article to read by the way, it was very interesting.) I agree separate paragraphs might have been nicer in being able to follow the support you have, I had a bit of trouble figuring out which examples went with which techniques every once in a while, but otherwise it was a very nice close reading. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete